TigerTriple.com

Talk => Speaking Of Bikes... => Topic started by: Brother Number One on May 04, 2006, 03:03:44 PM

Title: fuel light min and max
Post by: Brother Number One on May 04, 2006, 03:03:44 PM
Hi All,



What's your worst and best range to fuel light on?  So far, my worst is 160 miles and my best is 212 miles.  Both of these figures have come more than once.  High speed cruising (80-100mph  :twisted: ) through Spain gave the worst fuel consumption, swinging through the twisties gave the best.  My bike's an 04.
Title:
Post by: echoyankee on May 04, 2006, 05:54:58 PM
I'm on a 2001



worst for me is about 180



best is in the 220-230 range.  



HIGHLY dependent on city vs. highway environment.



Best,



echoyankee
Title:
Post by: haulin' daze on May 04, 2006, 07:26:49 PM
192 and 208, but those are my only fill-ups since I'm still breaking her in. How much fuel is left once the light comes on?
Title:
Post by: apache on May 04, 2006, 09:26:39 PM
lucky you, light on at 150, pushin the bike by 220. 97 steamer.
Title:
Post by: jp4evr on May 04, 2006, 10:41:12 PM
My light has yet to come on.  I guess my worst is about 220 and my best to date is 350.  ... hmm - maybe i should count the teeth on my sprockets?



maybe my light doesn't work and i've just been lucky??? I've put just about the max fuel in a couple of times so I'm thinking my light no-worky
Title:
Post by: apache on May 05, 2006, 12:40:37 AM
I think not in your case. at 210 miles I can usually get 6 gals in the tank. I figure I get 35/37 mpg
Title:
Post by: Jim S on May 05, 2006, 02:45:38 AM
Good grief! And they told me my Varadero was greedy! THat's horrendous, at least the Varadero could return over 40mpg. Not much in it really, apart from the Varadero is far quicker than the Triumph.

I've not had mine long enough to check the consumption yet but I'll check the next tankfull.
Title:
Post by: Brother Number One on May 05, 2006, 01:39:25 PM
Quote from: "Jim S"Good grief! And they told me my Varadero was greedy! THat's horrendous, at least the Varadero could return over 40mpg. Not much in it really, apart from the Varadero is far quicker than the Triumph.

I've not had mine long enough to check the consumption yet but I'll check the next tankfull.

200 miles to light-on equates to about 10 miles per litre which is about 46mpg; not bad, surely.



At 93hp and 241kg I'm surprised you found the Varadero to be quicker  :evil: , let alone far quicker.  I have an 850 TDM which is like a lawnmower compared to the Tiger.  A mate has just bought the touring V-Strom so that will be an interesting comparison, too.

:smt014
Title:
Post by: TRKTEK on May 05, 2006, 03:23:19 PM
Light on between 300 and 325 K however when topping up as soon as the light comes on The most I've squeezed in was 20L......

Not so bad having a light and a gauge that lies to the good.....



Remember the days with a fuel petcock you had to reach for as the bike sputtered? and the colourful language you yelled at yourself inside your helmet when discovering you had forgotten to take it off reserve after filling up :oops:



All part of the adventure......
Title:
Post by: NortonCharlie on May 05, 2006, 04:06:53 PM
Quote from: "apache"I think not in your case. at 210 miles I can usually get 6 gals in the tank. I figure I get 35/37 mpg

The only time I got 6 gallons in my tank was when I pushed it to the pump after running out.  I can typically put in 5 gallons when the fuel light comes on.
Title:
Post by: Guest on May 06, 2006, 02:29:27 PM
Quote from: "Jim S"Good grief! And they told me my Varadero was greedy! THat's horrendous, at least the Varadero could return over 40mpg. Not much in it really, apart from the Varadero is far quicker than the Triumph.

I've not had mine long enough to check the consumption yet but I'll check the next tankfull.



What you failed to notice is that this gent comes from the land of the small gallon (USA). So 35/gall over there is about the same as 43 over here.



Anyway, I've had 259 miles before the light, cruising my way through some hilly bits of Spain. I do have a 19T front sprocket though. Which is nice!

My worst.....can't remember. I only remember the good bits.
Title:
Post by: Guest on May 06, 2006, 02:36:24 PM
Quote from: "NortonCharlie"The only time I got 6 gallons in my tank was when I pushed it to the pump after running out.  I can typically put in 5 gallons when the fuel light comes on.



You'd be unlikely to get 6 UK gallons in even if was dry. Triumph claim that it's a 24 litre tank. So 24x4.54=5.29 Gallons (UK).

Me? I get the fuel light at (almost exactly) 18 litres used = 4 gallons consistently. If you get 5 gallons in at the fuel light then the sender's adjusted wrong and you run the risk of a lot of "pushing it to the pumps".
Title:
Post by: NortonCharlie on May 06, 2006, 03:14:42 PM
Quote from: "Blacktiger"You'd be unlikely to get 6 UK gallons in even if was dry. Triumph claim that it's a 24 litre tank. So 24x4.54=5.29 Gallons (UK).

Me? I get the fuel light at (almost exactly) 18 litres used = 4 gallons consistently. If you get 5 gallons in at the fuel light then the sender's adjusted wrong and you run the risk of a lot of "pushing it to the pumps".

I'm using those little US gallonsand have almost exactly one of those little gallons left when the light comes on, and unlike many my Tigers fuel gage is the most accurate linier fuel gage I have ever had.  That is once you figure out the the light comes on at the bottom of the red and the needle continues to the stop at empty.
Title:
Post by: iansoady on May 06, 2006, 04:36:28 PM
Quote from: "Blacktiger"If you get 5 gallons in at the fuel light then the sender's adjusted wrong and you run the risk of a lot of "pushing it to the pumps".

Adjusted? How do you do that then?
Title:
Post by: Onedownfiveup on May 07, 2006, 05:11:56 AM
I got 46 mpg after a tank and a half of riding today. I normally only put 2 gallons in it when I am just crusing around town. I have only done 1 full tank to light day and that was around 200 miles. Pretty damn good really. I think there is around 1.5 gallons left on the light for me.



I've got some serious monkey butt after today. Gotta get a corbin.
Title:
Post by: Brother Number One on May 07, 2006, 01:13:00 PM
221, yesterday, a personal best  :!:

All with the misses on the back and most with the Touratechs.  I put it down to the very slow Morocco speed limits.

That's about 50mpg  :?:  :D
Title:
Post by: Jim S on May 07, 2006, 11:39:48 PM
HI folks, ok, UK gallons, well, I don't know! Pump puts out litres! Ha ha! Ok, I did a fair run this week, 212 until the light came on, half two up and half one up fairly quick miles. It took 18.6 litres to fill it to the neck, around £17.00, that equates to approx four UK gallons? Sounds too good to be true.

Possibly it was not completely to the neck last fill? perhaps not this time so a bit of variation either way but I believe doubtful under 50 MPG?



So, possibly better than the Varadero in fuel consumption, 45MPG touring, high speed? Well, scarey! 30's? Going by the speedo the Honda is still quicker, and yes, by far. On the straight flat the Varadero would pull to the rev limiter reading 135MPH, the Tiger, on the same straight will not pull over 125MPH. In my honest opinion slower to get there as well. I'm simply calling it as I see it. BHP isn't everything. The RD04 Africa twin has less ponies than the RD07 but is still quicker.



I'll take the Tiger in for re-mapping of the injection as I've fitted a race can this week so I'll let you all know if there's any improvement. I'm enjoying the bike fine, just pointing out my findings on a different bike to my last. The Tiger is the sweetest sounding bike I've ever owned, I prefer the note over my Fireblade! Hope nobodies offended.
Title:
Post by: Brother Number One on May 08, 2006, 12:53:25 PM
Without earplugs and luggage I can just about hear my engine on the standard can; great note.  I'll be interested to know how you get on with the race can and remap.  Which one ya gone for?  Fancy the CCC meself but need the Premium Bondage things to yield a little more first.



 :D
Title: Some Data
Post by: tigerhund on May 08, 2006, 04:25:58 PM
Yesterday, I rode from Decatur, AL, to my home in Central Florida, a distance of 640 miles.  All but about 15 miles of this was interstate highway and I consistently cruised in the 80-90 range, except for about 100 miles in central Georgia where I was in the rain and operated around 60 mph.    I have the one tooth larger front sprocket from Thunderbike, which appears to have done very little for my fuel consumption, but engine works less hard.



My fuel consumption history from yesterday:



Started with full tank

148 miles:  Fuel light

168 miles:  ran out of fuel going up hill.  Stopped, added my camp stove bottle of spare gas (I have done this before and was prepared).  

176 miles:  ran out at pump.  Added 6.2 US gallons:  28.4 mpg not counting spare fuel that carried me eight miles.

359 miles:  Fuel light

361 miles:  (185 since fill up) Added 5.47 gallons:  33.8 mpg

549 miles:  Fuel light

552 miles:  (191 since fill up) 5.42 gallons:  35.2 mpg

640 miles:  (88 since fill up) 2.4 gallons:  36.7 mpg





I love my Tiger, but the tank is too small.   I have 955i with race can and appropriate programming for it.  



MJ
Title:
Post by: Jim S on May 08, 2006, 10:46:31 PM
With the standard pipe I'm suprised you can hear it over the damned wind noise! I bought a Carbon can co stainless steel can? Go figure? You'd think it would be carbon? Ha ha!

I really loved the sound but got paranoid about it being too loud. So, I bought a decibel killer from Ebay, a short baffle pipe to bolt on to the end of the can. It's now reasonably noisy! Over 4000 revs it howls!



I'll take it to the dealers later in the week and se if I can get it re-mapped and let you know how I get on.
Title: Re: Some Data
Post by: jp4evr on May 09, 2006, 12:20:44 AM
Quote from: "tigerhund"I love my Tiger, but the tank is too small.   I have 955i with race can and appropriate programming for it.  



MJ



Perhaps your right wrist has a bit too much twist.  Honestly, fuel consumption like with any vehicle, is greatly influenced by one's use of the "go-pedal" "wrist twist" - whatever you want to call it.  



I operate almost exclusively below 5000 rpms and enjoy excellent MPG.  Race can, race tune, thunderbike bars, yada yada... of course, I only weigh 170 lbs so I'm not lugging a bunch of weight around.
Title:
Post by: jcm on May 11, 2006, 05:19:55 PM
Still in the running in period, but from full to light I got 220 did another 9 to the pump and it took 20litres to full so that works out at about 52mpg cant be bad to that :D
Title:
Post by: GatorTiger on May 15, 2006, 08:38:29 PM
Quote from: "NortonCharlie"
Quote from: "apache"I think not in your case. at 210 miles I can usually get 6 gals in the tank. I figure I get 35/37 mpg

The only time I got 6 gallons in my tank was when I pushed it to the pump after running out.  I can typically put in 5 gallons when the fuel light comes on.



I concur with Charlie! My tiger gauge is the most predictable, not necessarily 100% accurate to what it indicates. But then again that might be philosophical!



Gauge shows 1/2 full at the line: 2.5 gals (US) gone

Gauge hits top of the red area: 4 gals gone

Gauge hits the bottom of red area: 5 gals gone and light come on



That would leave 1 gal for the "reserve". Never ran dry up to this point. I have 19/44 sprockets and are usually easy on the gas (except in Atlanta traffic...  :twisted: ) Best ever for me was about 58 mpg (the truth!!) going 50-65 mph on side roads. Just came back from a 1300 mile trip to Indianapolis (work related - no trip report... Almost all the way I was in the rain) and was averaging 50 mpg doing 80 in the interstates...



Love my cat!!!!  8)
Title:
Post by: Green Geck0 on May 16, 2006, 04:11:57 PM
I can usually sqeeze out ~400 miles per fill.   :lol:



(http://www.mototrek.com/tt/1.JPG)



Curtis Ross

Calgary, Alberta
Title:
Post by: Brother Number One on May 16, 2006, 06:43:08 PM
Would have matched a silver bike!  Nice set-up.  :D
Title:
Post by: GatorTiger on May 16, 2006, 07:08:09 PM
Quote from: "Brother Number One"Would have matched a silver bike!  Nice set-up.  :D

What Curtis didn't say is that this thing is carbonation-proof and hooks up to his camel back, not the tank... Cheers!!  8)
Title: checked every tank
Post by: obxtiger on May 18, 2006, 03:29:41 AM
i've had my bike a year now 20,000 miles so far. i've checked every tank so far. i usually fill up at 200 miles. worst tank 42 mpg best tank 48 mpg. low fuel lights been on once and it made the check engine light come on. :shock:  oh well just my 2c worth.
Title:
Post by: phragment on May 18, 2006, 05:43:08 PM
Just done 217 miles on 19 litres - that's 52mpg (Imperial). Almost all solo, never going over 5000rpm. Boring but economical I guess.
EhPortal 1.34 © 2025, WebDev