TigerTriple.com

Talk => Tiger Gallery => Topic started by: Bandit33 on September 05, 2008, 12:08:26 AM

Title: 95 Tiger Steamer
Post by: Bandit33 on September 05, 2008, 12:08:26 AM
Hi guys, new here.  Just acquired a 95 Steamer......it had low mileage and was in great shape.....could not resist: my first European bike....


(//%5Bimg%5Dhttp://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w60/Bandit33_photos/tigerblue2.jpg)[/img]


(//%5Bimg%5Dhttp://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w60/Bandit33_photos/tigerblue.jpg)[/img]

Don
Title:
Post by: Stretch on September 05, 2008, 12:32:48 AM
Looks well cared for.  Love the color.  

Welcome aboard!
Title:
Post by: HockleyBoy on September 05, 2008, 01:28:58 PM
Nice looking bike, hope you enjoy it.
Title:
Post by: Bandit33 on September 05, 2008, 08:14:01 PM
Thanks, have put about 500 miles on it since I got it.  Now need to get some "action" shots of it.  Have enjoyed it so far......it is somewhat different from my V-Strom and DR650.....

Don
Title:
Post by: steammoto on September 07, 2008, 08:03:36 PM
Welcome. Bike looks to be in great shape, how many miles on the odom?

I've been considering the vstrom as a possible addition or replacement, a comparo of the V to the tiger would be appreciated.

And you are most likely aware of this but if not be sure battery is not weak and use the choke when starting the bike. Enjoy the new ride.
Title:
Post by: Bandit33 on September 08, 2008, 08:37:38 PM
Actually, the bike only had about 8300 miles on it,.....must admit that a low mileage bike makes me nervous.  In this case the previous owner had a bunch of bikes and he only rode this one occasionally.   So far, it seems to be working out well, it seems to run really well.  The vinyl on the seat was in bad shape and I have already had it recovered.
Comparing the V strom DL1000 to the tiger:  Power seems about equal, I get much more fuel mileage on the Strom though, about 50 mpg for it (that overdrive 6th gear makes a difference) and so far about 36 for the Tiger......(hopefully going up a tooth on the front sprocket will help with that).  Less windshield buffeting from the Tiger.   Seat comfort is about the same for long rides....a little more leg-room on the Strom.  Not sure which is more dirt road worthy; have not really had the Tiger offroad yet.  The Strom has only been down relatively smooth dirt roads.  I suspect the Tiger might be better on the dirty stuff compared to the V.  So far really enjoying the Tiger, hope to get it out on some longer rides.
Title:
Post by: aeronca on September 08, 2008, 08:39:49 PM
sweet machine, you've got the fastest and best color :D
Title:
Post by: Mustang on September 08, 2008, 10:31:40 PM
Quote from: "aeronca"sweet machine, you've got the fastest and best color :D
(http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee47/2uoykcuf/emoticons/DirtDOG.gif)(http://i231.photobucket.com/albums/ee47/2uoykcuf/emoticons/cid_9FE4890DBB3240B8B04530E1DC32D34.gif)
Title:
Post by: steammoto on September 14, 2008, 03:59:15 AM
Bandit33 thanks for the insight.

I think you will like the 19T up front, smooths out the vibes. Besides changing out the counter sprocket will provide you the opportunity to clean out all the muck that has accumulated inside the cover.   :)
Title:
Post by: CrazyTed on September 14, 2008, 04:04:28 AM
I have a 97 Tiger.  How hard is it to get to the front sprocket?  I looks like I have to take off the shifter and the clutch master cylinder appears to be in the way.  Anybody shed some light on that?
Title:
Post by: Mustang on September 14, 2008, 03:35:58 PM
Quote from: "CrazyTed"I have a 97 Tiger.  How hard is it to get to the front sprocket?  I looks like I have to take off the shifter and the clutch master cylinder appears to be in the way.  Anybody shed some light on that?

See this http://tigertriple.com/forum/index.php/msg,31551#31551
Title:
Post by: JetdocX on September 14, 2008, 03:40:34 PM
Welcome!  Purty bloo Tigger ya got there. :D

The Green ones are more faster, though. :P
Title:
Post by: Bandit33 on September 15, 2008, 10:54:49 PM
So, putting the 19 tooth front sprocket on would lower the rpms down about how much?....say at 70 mph?......about 400 or so rpms?

Does anyone ever change out the rear sprocket with one with fewer teeth, say go down 2 or 3 teeth?

Don
Title:
Post by: Mustang on September 15, 2008, 10:59:54 PM
Quote from: "Bandit33"So, putting the 19 tooth front sprocket on would lower the rpms down about how much?....say at 70 mph?......about 400 or so rpms?

Does anyone ever change out the rear sprocket with one with fewer teeth, say go down 2 or 3 teeth?

Don

You could go with a 45 tooth rear but you may have to take two links out of the chain .
And yep pretty much 4-500 rpm for 1 tooth on the front a 19 would yeild approx 3500 rpm at 60-65 mph  :5moped
Title:
Post by: atokad on September 23, 2008, 06:27:01 AM
Quote from: "Stretch"Looks well cared for.  Love the color.  

Welcome aboard!

Ooohhh, nice!!  I happen to like that color very much too!  :lol:

(http://i115.photobucket.com/albums/n313/atokadok/Guanella%20Pass_091708/P9180398.jpg)
Title:
Post by: Mudhen on September 25, 2008, 02:39:24 AM
Quote from: "Mustang"
Quote from: "Bandit33"So, putting the 19 tooth front sprocket on would lower the rpms down about how much?....say at 70 mph?......about 400 or so rpms?

Does anyone ever change out the rear sprocket with one with fewer teeth, say go down 2 or 3 teeth?

Don

You could go with a 45 tooth rear but you may have to take two links out of the chain .
And yep pretty much 4-500 rpm for 1 tooth on the front a 19 would yeild approx 3500 rpm at 60-65 mph  :5moped

I bet you wouldn't need to change the number of links in the chain for 3 teeth in the rear...I used to use +5 in the rear -1 in the front and still had a little room in my adjuster.
Title:
Post by: Mustang on September 25, 2008, 01:30:10 PM
Quote from: "Mudhen"I bet you wouldn't need to change the number of links in the chain for 3 teeth in the rear...I used to use +5 in the rear -1 in the front and still had a little room in my adjuster.
Yeah but he wants to go the other way 3 teeth smaller in back and I think a 114 link chain will be too loose
Title:
Post by: Mudhen on September 25, 2008, 01:42:43 PM
Quote from: "Mustang"
Quote from: "Mudhen"I bet you wouldn't need to change the number of links in the chain for 3 teeth in the rear...I used to use +5 in the rear -1 in the front and still had a little room in my adjuster.
Yeah but he wants to go the other way 3 teeth smaller in back and I think a 114 link chain will be too loose

I realize that, but shouldn't it be the same either way?  3 up and the eccentric swings one way, 3 down and it swings the other?

Or is it that the eccentric isn't really centered, so going smaller would create the issue?  Been 15k miles since my bike had 18/48 on it...can't remember where the eccentric used to sit...

Come on Bandit...give it a whirl and solve this for us.  :wink:
Title:
Post by: Mustang on September 25, 2008, 02:51:01 PM
Quote from: "Mudhen"Or is it that the eccentric isn't really centered, so going smaller would create the issue?  :

DING DING DING  we have a winner ! :D

With 18/48 sprockets you can  use a 112 link chain , even though Triumph calls for a 114 link one .
EhPortal 1.34 © 2025, WebDev