New Triumph Tiger Tune

[Chris Canning]

Hmmm!!,well the tune that was in was well ragged of the bottom,apart from that it was fine,I ride my Tiger gung ho,but I don't like the tune that way,the new tune is crisp and certainley more HP and better on fuel but way to vibey on the motorway,fine for a 200 mile thrash round the block but long distance real waring,in fact having now done a few miles feels like the bugger that drove me nuts riding down to Valencia 7 years ago

Not really helped with me tinkering with the forks and new tyres and having the Touratech guards attached to the end off the bars, so all a bit of a pigs ear at the mo  :(

[tigergotcha]

I wanted to see if there are any differences in different 955i 2006 Sagem 10173 tunes;

I compared two files, one taken from a last year zip file, dated may 24 2010, the second is the famous nov 12 2010.

Result?

Hex Comparison ver. 2.0 states they're IDENTICAL!
http://www.exeicon.com/hex-comparison/?from=hfcmainform

I also compared different files (10172 with 10173) in order to see if the software was working properly; it was - all differences where visible.

So what?

bye
Tigergotcha

[Bixxer Bob]

Biggest problem I've found is knowing what you are comparing.

I did a compare last month:

http://tigertriple.com/forum/index.php/topic,9106

and used a known old Tuneboy version of 10173 vs the lastest from Tune ECU.  There was a definite difference at the bottom end.  Now whether that diffrence came from Triumph or someone meddling with the the web versions is anyone's guess but it has made a slight change for the better.  On my bike anyway....  :roll: